Bank of America’s 45 billion dollar “bailout”


NEW YORK - SEPTEMBER 15:  Bank of America CEO ...
Image by Getty Images via Daylife

Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2009/01/12/daily47.html

40 billion on top of the 100 billion in loan guarantees. On top of this, Ken Lewis (BoA’s CEO), claimed in Oct 2008 they didn’t even need any bailout money, but it was their patriotic duty to accept it.

So did they know in Oct 08 that Merrill Lynch was a bad deal, that they couldn’t afford but claimed they were in good shape to mislead investors? Or are they so incompetent they couldn’t tell? Either way, BoA didn’t buy Merrill Lynch, the US taxpayers did.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Seems about right
California suspends welfare, student grants & tax refunds

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!